Review



imagej software program 7.0a  (GraphPad Software Inc)

 
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
    • 90
      Buy from Supplier

    Structured Review

    GraphPad Software Inc imagej software program 7.0a
    Immunofluorescence images of F-actin and quantification of actin stress fibers in hMVECs after gamma irradiation. ( a ) The structure and alignment of the actin filaments in the hMVECs changed after the gamma irradiation exposure. ( b ) Representative immunofluorescence images of F-actin and quantification for the percentage of cells with different numbers of actin stress fibers after gamma irradiation. (scale bar: 50 µm, * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001, n = 3 (15 randomly chosen hMVECs = 1)). Statistical comparison were calculated with two-tailed t-tests using Prism (7.0a, <t>GraphPad</t> <t>software,</t> www.graphpad.com ). Images were analyzed using <t>ImageJ</t> (1.52q, NIH, www.imagej.nih.gov/ij ). All the images and graph were created with Adobe illustrator (CC 2019 23.0.1, www.adobe.com ).
    Imagej Software Program 7.0a, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/imagej software program 7.0a/product/GraphPad Software Inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    imagej software program 7.0a - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    90/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Gamma irradiation exposure for collapsed cell junctions and reduced angiogenesis of 3-D in vitro blood vessels"

    Article Title: Gamma irradiation exposure for collapsed cell junctions and reduced angiogenesis of 3-D in vitro blood vessels

    Journal: Scientific Reports

    doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-97692-8

    Immunofluorescence images of F-actin and quantification of actin stress fibers in hMVECs after gamma irradiation. ( a ) The structure and alignment of the actin filaments in the hMVECs changed after the gamma irradiation exposure. ( b ) Representative immunofluorescence images of F-actin and quantification for the percentage of cells with different numbers of actin stress fibers after gamma irradiation. (scale bar: 50 µm, * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001, n = 3 (15 randomly chosen hMVECs = 1)). Statistical comparison were calculated with two-tailed t-tests using Prism (7.0a, GraphPad software, www.graphpad.com ). Images were analyzed using ImageJ (1.52q, NIH, www.imagej.nih.gov/ij ). All the images and graph were created with Adobe illustrator (CC 2019 23.0.1, www.adobe.com ).
    Figure Legend Snippet: Immunofluorescence images of F-actin and quantification of actin stress fibers in hMVECs after gamma irradiation. ( a ) The structure and alignment of the actin filaments in the hMVECs changed after the gamma irradiation exposure. ( b ) Representative immunofluorescence images of F-actin and quantification for the percentage of cells with different numbers of actin stress fibers after gamma irradiation. (scale bar: 50 µm, * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001, n = 3 (15 randomly chosen hMVECs = 1)). Statistical comparison were calculated with two-tailed t-tests using Prism (7.0a, GraphPad software, www.graphpad.com ). Images were analyzed using ImageJ (1.52q, NIH, www.imagej.nih.gov/ij ). All the images and graph were created with Adobe illustrator (CC 2019 23.0.1, www.adobe.com ).

    Techniques Used: Immunofluorescence, Irradiation, Comparison, Two Tailed Test, Software

    Representative fluorescence images and calculated permeability values of endothelial barriers after irradiation. ( a ) The tight hMVECs’ monolayer showed a sharp decrease in the intensity ( \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\Delta {\varvec{C}}$$\end{document} Δ C ) at the interface between the hMVECs and the remodeled ECM. In addition, the intensity gradient \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\left( {\frac{{\partial {\varvec{C}}}}{{\partial {\varvec{x}}}}} \right)$$\end{document} ∂ C ∂ x in the ECM was measured in the normalized intensity profile with ImageJ (1.52q, NIH, www.imagej.nih.gov/ij ). These intensity values vary according to the barrier permeability. (b) The permeability values of the hMVECs’ monolayer after 0, 4, and 8 Gy of gamma irradiation treatment (scale bar: 100 and 200 µm; * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001, n = 4). Statistical comparison were calculated with two-tailed t-tests using Prism (7.0a, GraphPad software, www.graphpad.com ). Images and graphs were created with Adobe illustrator (CC 2019 23.0.1, www.adobe.com ).
    Figure Legend Snippet: Representative fluorescence images and calculated permeability values of endothelial barriers after irradiation. ( a ) The tight hMVECs’ monolayer showed a sharp decrease in the intensity ( \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\Delta {\varvec{C}}$$\end{document} Δ C ) at the interface between the hMVECs and the remodeled ECM. In addition, the intensity gradient \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\left( {\frac{{\partial {\varvec{C}}}}{{\partial {\varvec{x}}}}} \right)$$\end{document} ∂ C ∂ x in the ECM was measured in the normalized intensity profile with ImageJ (1.52q, NIH, www.imagej.nih.gov/ij ). These intensity values vary according to the barrier permeability. (b) The permeability values of the hMVECs’ monolayer after 0, 4, and 8 Gy of gamma irradiation treatment (scale bar: 100 and 200 µm; * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001, n = 4). Statistical comparison were calculated with two-tailed t-tests using Prism (7.0a, GraphPad software, www.graphpad.com ). Images and graphs were created with Adobe illustrator (CC 2019 23.0.1, www.adobe.com ).

    Techniques Used: Fluorescence, Permeability, Irradiation, Comparison, Two Tailed Test, Software



    Similar Products

    imagej software program 7.0a  (GraphPad Software Inc)
    90
    GraphPad Software Inc imagej software program 7.0a
    Immunofluorescence images of F-actin and quantification of actin stress fibers in hMVECs after gamma irradiation. ( a ) The structure and alignment of the actin filaments in the hMVECs changed after the gamma irradiation exposure. ( b ) Representative immunofluorescence images of F-actin and quantification for the percentage of cells with different numbers of actin stress fibers after gamma irradiation. (scale bar: 50 µm, * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001, n = 3 (15 randomly chosen hMVECs = 1)). Statistical comparison were calculated with two-tailed t-tests using Prism (7.0a, <t>GraphPad</t> <t>software,</t> www.graphpad.com ). Images were analyzed using <t>ImageJ</t> (1.52q, NIH, www.imagej.nih.gov/ij ). All the images and graph were created with Adobe illustrator (CC 2019 23.0.1, www.adobe.com ).
    Imagej Software Program 7.0a, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/imagej software program 7.0a/product/GraphPad Software Inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    imagej software program 7.0a - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Immunofluorescence images of F-actin and quantification of actin stress fibers in hMVECs after gamma irradiation. ( a ) The structure and alignment of the actin filaments in the hMVECs changed after the gamma irradiation exposure. ( b ) Representative immunofluorescence images of F-actin and quantification for the percentage of cells with different numbers of actin stress fibers after gamma irradiation. (scale bar: 50 µm, * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001, n = 3 (15 randomly chosen hMVECs = 1)). Statistical comparison were calculated with two-tailed t-tests using Prism (7.0a, GraphPad software, www.graphpad.com ). Images were analyzed using ImageJ (1.52q, NIH, www.imagej.nih.gov/ij ). All the images and graph were created with Adobe illustrator (CC 2019 23.0.1, www.adobe.com ).

    Journal: Scientific Reports

    Article Title: Gamma irradiation exposure for collapsed cell junctions and reduced angiogenesis of 3-D in vitro blood vessels

    doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-97692-8

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Immunofluorescence images of F-actin and quantification of actin stress fibers in hMVECs after gamma irradiation. ( a ) The structure and alignment of the actin filaments in the hMVECs changed after the gamma irradiation exposure. ( b ) Representative immunofluorescence images of F-actin and quantification for the percentage of cells with different numbers of actin stress fibers after gamma irradiation. (scale bar: 50 µm, * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001, n = 3 (15 randomly chosen hMVECs = 1)). Statistical comparison were calculated with two-tailed t-tests using Prism (7.0a, GraphPad software, www.graphpad.com ). Images were analyzed using ImageJ (1.52q, NIH, www.imagej.nih.gov/ij ). All the images and graph were created with Adobe illustrator (CC 2019 23.0.1, www.adobe.com ).

    Article Snippet: And, the diffusion profile of FITC–dextran was captured by fluorescence imaging, and the distribution was analyzed with the ImageJ software program (7.0a, GraphPad, www.graphpad.com ).

    Techniques: Immunofluorescence, Irradiation, Comparison, Two Tailed Test, Software

    Representative fluorescence images and calculated permeability values of endothelial barriers after irradiation. ( a ) The tight hMVECs’ monolayer showed a sharp decrease in the intensity ( \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\Delta {\varvec{C}}$$\end{document} Δ C ) at the interface between the hMVECs and the remodeled ECM. In addition, the intensity gradient \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\left( {\frac{{\partial {\varvec{C}}}}{{\partial {\varvec{x}}}}} \right)$$\end{document} ∂ C ∂ x in the ECM was measured in the normalized intensity profile with ImageJ (1.52q, NIH, www.imagej.nih.gov/ij ). These intensity values vary according to the barrier permeability. (b) The permeability values of the hMVECs’ monolayer after 0, 4, and 8 Gy of gamma irradiation treatment (scale bar: 100 and 200 µm; * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001, n = 4). Statistical comparison were calculated with two-tailed t-tests using Prism (7.0a, GraphPad software, www.graphpad.com ). Images and graphs were created with Adobe illustrator (CC 2019 23.0.1, www.adobe.com ).

    Journal: Scientific Reports

    Article Title: Gamma irradiation exposure for collapsed cell junctions and reduced angiogenesis of 3-D in vitro blood vessels

    doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-97692-8

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Representative fluorescence images and calculated permeability values of endothelial barriers after irradiation. ( a ) The tight hMVECs’ monolayer showed a sharp decrease in the intensity ( \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\Delta {\varvec{C}}$$\end{document} Δ C ) at the interface between the hMVECs and the remodeled ECM. In addition, the intensity gradient \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\left( {\frac{{\partial {\varvec{C}}}}{{\partial {\varvec{x}}}}} \right)$$\end{document} ∂ C ∂ x in the ECM was measured in the normalized intensity profile with ImageJ (1.52q, NIH, www.imagej.nih.gov/ij ). These intensity values vary according to the barrier permeability. (b) The permeability values of the hMVECs’ monolayer after 0, 4, and 8 Gy of gamma irradiation treatment (scale bar: 100 and 200 µm; * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001, n = 4). Statistical comparison were calculated with two-tailed t-tests using Prism (7.0a, GraphPad software, www.graphpad.com ). Images and graphs were created with Adobe illustrator (CC 2019 23.0.1, www.adobe.com ).

    Article Snippet: And, the diffusion profile of FITC–dextran was captured by fluorescence imaging, and the distribution was analyzed with the ImageJ software program (7.0a, GraphPad, www.graphpad.com ).

    Techniques: Fluorescence, Permeability, Irradiation, Comparison, Two Tailed Test, Software